LLM ethics benchmark: a three-dimensional assessment system for evaluating moral reasoning in large language models.
- DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-025-18489-7
- Published
- 2025 Oct 5
- Container
- Scientific reports
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1038/s41598-025-18489-7,
title = {LLM ethics benchmark: a three-dimensional assessment system for evaluating moral reasoning in large language models.},
author = {Jiao J and Afroogh S and Murali A and Chen K and Atkinson D and Dhurandhar A},
year = {2025},
journal = {Scientific reports},
doi = {10.1038/s41598-025-18489-7},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-18489-7}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - LLM ethics benchmark: a three-dimensional assessment system for evaluating moral reasoning in large language models. AU - Jiao J AU - Afroogh S AU - Murali A AU - Chen K AU - Atkinson D AU - Dhurandhar A PY - 2025 JO - Scientific reports DO - 10.1038/s41598-025-18489-7 UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-18489-7 ER -
APA
J, J., S, A., A, M., K, C., D, A., & A, D. (2025). LLM ethics benchmark: a three-dimensional assessment system for evaluating moral reasoning in large language models.. Scientific reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-18489-7
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T04:22:46.464Z