Comparative analysis of bypass vs. stent for coronary revascularization using an ex-vivo organ care system in an animal model.
- DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-026-50599-8
- Published
- 2026 May 12
- Container
- Scientific reports
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1038/s41598-026-50599-8,
title = {Comparative analysis of bypass vs. stent for coronary revascularization using an ex-vivo organ care system in an animal model.},
author = {Lindenhahn P and Hinkel R and Napp LC and Diekmann J and Bankstahl JP and Bengel FM and Volk H and Hiebl B and Hinrichs JB and Becker LS and Richter J and Pepelanova I and Jonigk D and Höffler K and Haverich A and Kaufeld T},
year = {2026},
journal = {Scientific reports},
doi = {10.1038/s41598-026-50599-8},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-50599-8}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparative analysis of bypass vs. stent for coronary revascularization using an ex-vivo organ care system in an animal model. AU - Lindenhahn P AU - Hinkel R AU - Napp LC AU - Diekmann J AU - Bankstahl JP AU - Bengel FM AU - Volk H AU - Hiebl B AU - Hinrichs JB AU - Becker LS AU - Richter J AU - Pepelanova I AU - Jonigk D AU - Höffler K AU - Haverich A AU - Kaufeld T PY - 2026 JO - Scientific reports DO - 10.1038/s41598-026-50599-8 UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-50599-8 ER -
APA
P, L., R, H., LC, N., J, D., JP, B., FM, B., H, V., B, H., JB, H., LS, B., J, R., I, P., D, J., K, H., A, H., & T, K. (2026). Comparative analysis of bypass vs. stent for coronary revascularization using an ex-vivo organ care system in an animal model.. Scientific reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-50599-8
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-27T00:21:44.936Z