Structured reasoning failures compromise LLM interpretation of clinical oncology notes.
- DOI
- 10.1038/s41746-026-02951-5
- Published
- 2026 Jun 30
- Container
- NPJ digital medicine
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1038/s41746-026-02951-5,
title = {Structured reasoning failures compromise LLM interpretation of clinical oncology notes.},
author = {Kenaston MW and Ayub U and Parmar M and Kumar P and Anjum MU and Naqvi SAA and Chaudhuri AA and Zakharia Y and Heath EI and Bekaii-Saab TS and Tao C and Van Allen EM and Zhou B and Choi Y and Baral C and Riaz IB},
year = {2026},
journal = {NPJ digital medicine},
doi = {10.1038/s41746-026-02951-5},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-02951-5}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Structured reasoning failures compromise LLM interpretation of clinical oncology notes. AU - Kenaston MW AU - Ayub U AU - Parmar M AU - Kumar P AU - Anjum MU AU - Naqvi SAA AU - Chaudhuri AA AU - Zakharia Y AU - Heath EI AU - Bekaii-Saab TS AU - Tao C AU - Van Allen EM AU - Zhou B AU - Choi Y AU - Baral C AU - Riaz IB PY - 2026 JO - NPJ digital medicine DO - 10.1038/s41746-026-02951-5 UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-02951-5 ER -
APA
MW, K., U, A., M, P., P, K., MU, A., SAA, N., AA, C., Y, Z., EI, H., TS, B., C, T., EM, V. A., B, Z., Y, C., C, B., & IB, R. (2026). Structured reasoning failures compromise LLM interpretation of clinical oncology notes.. NPJ digital medicine. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-02951-5
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T05:10:51.941Z