Plagiarism in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence: The advent of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools is challenging the scientific community's understanding of the meaning and significance of plagiarism. A new definition of research misconduct is needed that specifically addresses the use of GenAI writing tools.
- DOI
- 10.1038/s42256-026-01247-3
- Published
- 2026 May 18
- Container
- Nature machine intelligence
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1038/s42256-026-01247-3,
title = {Plagiarism in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence: The advent of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools is challenging the scientific community's understanding of the meaning and significance of plagiarism. A new definition of research misconduct is needed that specifically addresses the use of GenAI writing tools.},
author = {Resnik D and Hosseini M},
year = {2026},
journal = {Nature machine intelligence},
doi = {10.1038/s42256-026-01247-3},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-026-01247-3}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Plagiarism in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence: The advent of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools is challenging the scientific community's understanding of the meaning and significance of plagiarism. A new definition of research misconduct is needed that specifically addresses the use of GenAI writing tools. AU - Resnik D AU - Hosseini M PY - 2026 JO - Nature machine intelligence DO - 10.1038/s42256-026-01247-3 UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-026-01247-3 ER -
APA
D, R., & M, H. (2026). Plagiarism in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence: The advent of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools is challenging the scientific community's understanding of the meaning and significance of plagiarism. A new definition of research misconduct is needed that specifically addresses the use of GenAI writing tools.. Nature machine intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-026-01247-3
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T20:21:05.341Z