The validity and utility of Nova and the concept of ultra-processed foods for science and policy.
- DOI
- 10.1038/s43016-026-01371-8
- Published
- 2026 Jun
- Container
- Nature food
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1038/s43016-026-01371-8,
title = {The validity and utility of Nova and the concept of ultra-processed foods for science and policy.},
author = {Khandpur N and Geleijnse JM and Kamphuis CBM and Velema E and Poelman MP and Eshuis R and Djojosoeparto SK and Verweij MF and Moran AJ},
year = {2026},
journal = {Nature food},
doi = {10.1038/s43016-026-01371-8},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-026-01371-8}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - The validity and utility of Nova and the concept of ultra-processed foods for science and policy. AU - Khandpur N AU - Geleijnse JM AU - Kamphuis CBM AU - Velema E AU - Poelman MP AU - Eshuis R AU - Djojosoeparto SK AU - Verweij MF AU - Moran AJ PY - 2026 JO - Nature food DO - 10.1038/s43016-026-01371-8 UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-026-01371-8 ER -
APA
N, K., JM, G., CBM, K., E, V., MP, P., R, E., SK, D., MF, V., & AJ, M. (2026). The validity and utility of Nova and the concept of ultra-processed foods for science and policy.. Nature food. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-026-01371-8
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T14:13:45.806Z