Well-being as a primary endpoint in clinical trials: a call for consensus.
- DOI
- 10.1038/s44184-026-00234-1
- Published
- 2026-08-06
- Container
- Npj Ment Health Res
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1038/s44184-026-00234-1,
title = {Well-being as a primary endpoint in clinical trials: a call for consensus.},
author = {Marseille E and Kettner H and Sgambati TJ and Kahn JG and Bertozzi S and Lucas W and Carhart Harris R and Keltner D and Raison C.},
year = {2026},
journal = {Npj Ment Health Res},
doi = {10.1038/s44184-026-00234-1},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s44184-026-00234-1}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Well-being as a primary endpoint in clinical trials: a call for consensus. AU - Marseille E AU - Kettner H AU - Sgambati TJ AU - Kahn JG AU - Bertozzi S AU - Lucas W AU - Carhart Harris R AU - Keltner D AU - Raison C. PY - 2026 JO - Npj Ment Health Res DO - 10.1038/s44184-026-00234-1 UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/s44184-026-00234-1 ER -
APA
E, M., H, K., TJ, S., JG, K., S, B., W, L., R, C. H., D, K., & C., R. (2026). Well-being as a primary endpoint in clinical trials: a call for consensus.. Npj Ment Health Res. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44184-026-00234-1
Source records
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-26T01:30:18.825Z
- doaj · retrieved 2026-09-26T01:30:18.845Z