Reply to ‘Methodological concerns and interpretative limitations of assessing subjective effects of ketamine’

Jack D. C. Dahan, David Dadiomov, Tijmen Bostoen, Albert Dahan

Open source

DOI
10.1038/s44184-026-00241-2
Published
2026-09-22
Container
npj Mental Health Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1038/s44184-026-00241-2,
  title = {Reply to ‘Methodological concerns and interpretative limitations of assessing subjective effects of ketamine’},
  author = {Jack D. C. Dahan and David Dadiomov and Tijmen Bostoen and Albert Dahan},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {npj Mental Health Research},
  doi = {10.1038/s44184-026-00241-2},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s44184-026-00241-2}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Reply to ‘Methodological concerns and interpretative limitations of assessing subjective effects of ketamine’
AU  - Jack D. C. Dahan
AU  - David Dadiomov
AU  - Tijmen Bostoen
AU  - Albert Dahan
PY  - 2026
JO  - npj Mental Health Research
DO  - 10.1038/s44184-026-00241-2
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1038/s44184-026-00241-2
ER  - 

APA

Dahan, J. D. C., Dadiomov, D., Bostoen, T., & Dahan, A. (2026). Reply to ‘Methodological concerns and interpretative limitations of assessing subjective effects of ketamine’. npj Mental Health Research. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44184-026-00241-2

Source records