Closing the screening gap but not the writing gap: a two-topic evaluation of LLMs for systematic reviews and meta-analyses in hepatology.
- DOI
- 10.1038/s44355-026-00068-w
- Published
- 2026
- Container
- Npj gut and liver
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1038/s44355-026-00068-w,
title = {Closing the screening gap but not the writing gap: a two-topic evaluation of LLMs for systematic reviews and meta-analyses in hepatology.},
author = {Zou Y and Kim I and Gao N and Li M and Kim MO and Ge J},
year = {2026},
journal = {Npj gut and liver},
doi = {10.1038/s44355-026-00068-w},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s44355-026-00068-w}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Closing the screening gap but not the writing gap: a two-topic evaluation of LLMs for systematic reviews and meta-analyses in hepatology. AU - Zou Y AU - Kim I AU - Gao N AU - Li M AU - Kim MO AU - Ge J PY - 2026 JO - Npj gut and liver DO - 10.1038/s44355-026-00068-w UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/s44355-026-00068-w ER -
APA
Y, Z., I, K., N, G., M, L., MO, K., & J, G. (2026). Closing the screening gap but not the writing gap: a two-topic evaluation of LLMs for systematic reviews and meta-analyses in hepatology.. Npj gut and liver. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44355-026-00068-w
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-11-10T20:44:29.863Z