Reference quality of OpenEvidence across five medical specialties.
- DOI
- 10.1038/s44401-026-00142-8
- Published
- 2026 Sep 2
- Container
- npj health systems
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1038/s44401-026-00142-8,
title = {Reference quality of OpenEvidence across five medical specialties.},
author = {Lotan T and Omar M and Barash Y and Kruskal JB and Ahmed M and Brook OR and Klang E and Gorenshtein A},
year = {2026},
journal = {npj health systems},
doi = {10.1038/s44401-026-00142-8},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s44401-026-00142-8}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Reference quality of OpenEvidence across five medical specialties. AU - Lotan T AU - Omar M AU - Barash Y AU - Kruskal JB AU - Ahmed M AU - Brook OR AU - Klang E AU - Gorenshtein A PY - 2026 JO - npj health systems DO - 10.1038/s44401-026-00142-8 UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/s44401-026-00142-8 ER -
APA
T, L., M, O., Y, B., JB, K., M, A., OR, B., E, K., & A, G. (2026). Reference quality of OpenEvidence across five medical specialties.. npj health systems. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44401-026-00142-8
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T15:19:31.627Z