eConsent vs traditional consent among prospective biobank participants: a randomized study within a study trial.
- DOI
- 10.1038/s44482-026-00013-x
- Published
- 2026
- Container
- npj digital public health
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1038/s44482-026-00013-x,
title = {eConsent vs traditional consent among prospective biobank participants: a randomized study within a study trial.},
author = {Vogt-Yerem RL and Heck PR and Gjorgjieva T and Mestechkin R and Rosica D and Huynh A and Chabris CF and Kirchner HL and Wilbanks J and Doerr M and Wagner JK and Meyer MN},
year = {2026},
journal = {npj digital public health},
doi = {10.1038/s44482-026-00013-x},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s44482-026-00013-x}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - eConsent vs traditional consent among prospective biobank participants: a randomized study within a study trial. AU - Vogt-Yerem RL AU - Heck PR AU - Gjorgjieva T AU - Mestechkin R AU - Rosica D AU - Huynh A AU - Chabris CF AU - Kirchner HL AU - Wilbanks J AU - Doerr M AU - Wagner JK AU - Meyer MN PY - 2026 JO - npj digital public health DO - 10.1038/s44482-026-00013-x UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/s44482-026-00013-x ER -
APA
RL, V., PR, H., T, G., R, M., D, R., A, H., CF, C., HL, K., J, W., M, D., JK, W., & MN, M. (2026). eConsent vs traditional consent among prospective biobank participants: a randomized study within a study trial.. npj digital public health. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44482-026-00013-x
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T21:49:38.335Z
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-25T21:49:38.339Z