Comparisons of aerosol backscatter using satellite and ground lidars: implications for calibrating and validating spaceborne lidar.

Gimmestad G, Forrister H, Grigas T, O'Dowd C

DOI: 10.1038/srep42337
Published: 2017 Feb 15
Container: Scientific reports
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1038/srep42337,
  title = {Comparisons of aerosol backscatter using satellite and ground lidars: implications for calibrating and validating spaceborne lidar.},
  author = {Gimmestad G and Forrister H and Grigas T and O'Dowd C},
  year = {2017},
  journal = {Scientific reports},
  doi = {10.1038/srep42337},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42337}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparisons of aerosol backscatter using satellite and ground lidars: implications for calibrating and validating spaceborne lidar.
AU  - Gimmestad G
AU  - Forrister H
AU  - Grigas T
AU  - O'Dowd C
PY  - 2017
JO  - Scientific reports
DO  - 10.1038/srep42337
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42337
ER  -

APA

G, G., H, F., T, G., & C, O. (2017). Comparisons of aerosol backscatter using satellite and ground lidars: implications for calibrating and validating spaceborne lidar.. Scientific reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42337

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T02:26:18.194Z
europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-25T02:26:18.232Z