The reaction step: general discussion.
- DOI
- 10.1039/d2fd90049a
- Published
- 2022 Oct 21
- Container
- Faraday discussions
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1039/d2fd90049a,
title = {The reaction step: general discussion.},
author = {Burke MP and Casavecchia P and Cavallotti C and Clary DC and Doner A and Green WH and Grinberg Dana A and Guo H and Heathcote D and Hochlaf M and Klippenstein SJ and Kuwata KT and Lawrence JE and Lourderaj U and Mebel AM and Milesevic D and Mullin AS and Nguyen TL and Olzmann M and Orr-Ewing AJ and Osborn DL and Pazdera TM and Robertson PA and Robinson MS and Rotavera B and Seakins PW and Shannon RJ and Shiels OJ and Suits AG and Trevitt AJ and Troe J and Vallance C and Welz O and Zhang F and Zádor J},
year = {2022},
journal = {Faraday discussions},
doi = {10.1039/d2fd90049a},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1039/d2fd90049a}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - The reaction step: general discussion. AU - Burke MP AU - Casavecchia P AU - Cavallotti C AU - Clary DC AU - Doner A AU - Green WH AU - Grinberg Dana A AU - Guo H AU - Heathcote D AU - Hochlaf M AU - Klippenstein SJ AU - Kuwata KT AU - Lawrence JE AU - Lourderaj U AU - Mebel AM AU - Milesevic D AU - Mullin AS AU - Nguyen TL AU - Olzmann M AU - Orr-Ewing AJ AU - Osborn DL AU - Pazdera TM AU - Robertson PA AU - Robinson MS AU - Rotavera B AU - Seakins PW AU - Shannon RJ AU - Shiels OJ AU - Suits AG AU - Trevitt AJ AU - Troe J AU - Vallance C AU - Welz O AU - Zhang F AU - Zádor J PY - 2022 JO - Faraday discussions DO - 10.1039/d2fd90049a UR - https://doi.org/10.1039/d2fd90049a ER -
APA
MP, B., P, C., C, C., DC, C., A, D., WH, G., A, G. D., H, G., D, H., M, H., SJ, K., KT, K., JE, L., U, L., AM, M., D, M., AS, M., TL, N., M, O., AJ, O., DL, O., TM, P., PA, R., MS, R., B, R., PW, S., RJ, S., OJ, S., AG, S., AJ, T., J, T., C, V., O, W., F, Z., & J, Z. (2022). The reaction step: general discussion.. Faraday discussions. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2fd90049a
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-11-10T19:51:58.117Z