Lipophilic mono-guanidines versus mono-(thio)ureas: anion transport, lipid binding, and antibacterial activity.
- DOI
- 10.1039/d6ra04370d
- Published
- 2026 Aug 5
- Container
- RSC advances
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1039/d6ra04370d,
title = {Lipophilic mono-guanidines versus mono-(thio)ureas: anion transport, lipid binding, and antibacterial activity.},
author = {De Silva Weerakonda Arachchige RD and Marshall SR and Gneid H and Busschaert N},
year = {2026},
journal = {RSC advances},
doi = {10.1039/d6ra04370d},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1039/d6ra04370d}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Lipophilic mono-guanidines versus mono-(thio)ureas: anion transport, lipid binding, and antibacterial activity. AU - De Silva Weerakonda Arachchige RD AU - Marshall SR AU - Gneid H AU - Busschaert N PY - 2026 JO - RSC advances DO - 10.1039/d6ra04370d UR - https://doi.org/10.1039/d6ra04370d ER -
APA
RD, D. S. W. A., SR, M., H, G., & N, B. (2026). Lipophilic mono-guanidines versus mono-(thio)ureas: anion transport, lipid binding, and antibacterial activity.. RSC advances. https://doi.org/10.1039/d6ra04370d
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T20:17:40.073Z