Lipophilic mono-guanidines versus mono-(thio)ureas: anion transport, lipid binding, and antibacterial activity.

De Silva Weerakonda Arachchige RD, Marshall SR, Gneid H, Busschaert N

Open source

DOI
10.1039/d6ra04370d
Published
2026 Aug 5
Container
RSC advances
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1039/d6ra04370d,
  title = {Lipophilic mono-guanidines versus mono-(thio)ureas: anion transport, lipid binding, and antibacterial activity.},
  author = {De Silva Weerakonda Arachchige RD and Marshall SR and Gneid H and Busschaert N},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {RSC advances},
  doi = {10.1039/d6ra04370d},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1039/d6ra04370d}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Lipophilic mono-guanidines versus mono-(thio)ureas: anion transport, lipid binding, and antibacterial activity.
AU  - De Silva Weerakonda Arachchige RD
AU  - Marshall SR
AU  - Gneid H
AU  - Busschaert N
PY  - 2026
JO  - RSC advances
DO  - 10.1039/d6ra04370d
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1039/d6ra04370d
ER  - 

APA

RD, D. S. W. A., SR, M., H, G., & N, B. (2026). Lipophilic mono-guanidines versus mono-(thio)ureas: anion transport, lipid binding, and antibacterial activity.. RSC advances. https://doi.org/10.1039/d6ra04370d

Source records