Comparison of two different anesthesia regimens in patients undergoing aortocoronary bypass grafting surgery: sufentanil-midazolam versus remifentanil-propofol.
- DOI
- 10.1053/jcan.2000.7945
- Published
- 2000 Aug
- Container
- Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
serious concern Score 8/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- serious concernRetraction Watch retraction: 1 retraction notice matched this DOI.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1053/jcan.2000.7945,
title = {Comparison of two different anesthesia regimens in patients undergoing aortocoronary bypass grafting surgery: sufentanil-midazolam versus remifentanil-propofol.},
author = {Lehmann A and Zeitler C and Thaler E and Isgro F and Boldt J},
year = {2000},
journal = {Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia},
doi = {10.1053/jcan.2000.7945},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1053/jcan.2000.7945}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparison of two different anesthesia regimens in patients undergoing aortocoronary bypass grafting surgery: sufentanil-midazolam versus remifentanil-propofol. AU - Lehmann A AU - Zeitler C AU - Thaler E AU - Isgro F AU - Boldt J PY - 2000 JO - Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia DO - 10.1053/jcan.2000.7945 UR - https://doi.org/10.1053/jcan.2000.7945 ER -
APA
A, L., C, Z., E, T., F, I., & J, B. (2000). Comparison of two different anesthesia regimens in patients undergoing aortocoronary bypass grafting surgery: sufentanil-midazolam versus remifentanil-propofol.. Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia. https://doi.org/10.1053/jcan.2000.7945
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-24T19:48:14.766Z