Impact of guidewire caliber on ERCP outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing 0.025- and 0.035-inch guidewires.
- DOI
- 10.1055/a-1834-7101
- Published
- 2022 Jul
- Container
- Endoscopy international open
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1055/a-1834-7101,
title = {Impact of guidewire caliber on ERCP outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing 0.025- and 0.035-inch guidewires.},
author = {Aziz M and Iqbal A and Ahmed Z and Saleem S and Lee-Smith W and Goyal H and Kamal F and Alastal Y and Nawras A and Adler DG},
year = {2022},
journal = {Endoscopy international open},
doi = {10.1055/a-1834-7101},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1834-7101}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Impact of guidewire caliber on ERCP outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing 0.025- and 0.035-inch guidewires. AU - Aziz M AU - Iqbal A AU - Ahmed Z AU - Saleem S AU - Lee-Smith W AU - Goyal H AU - Kamal F AU - Alastal Y AU - Nawras A AU - Adler DG PY - 2022 JO - Endoscopy international open DO - 10.1055/a-1834-7101 UR - https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1834-7101 ER -
APA
M, A., A, I., Z, A., S, S., W, L., H, G., F, K., Y, A., A, N., & DG, A. (2022). Impact of guidewire caliber on ERCP outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing 0.025- and 0.035-inch guidewires.. Endoscopy international open. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1834-7101
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T03:20:35.216Z