Impact of guidewire caliber on ERCP outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing 0.025- and 0.035-inch guidewires.

Aziz M, Iqbal A, Ahmed Z, Saleem S, Lee-Smith W, Goyal H, Kamal F, Alastal Y, Nawras A, Adler DG

Open source

DOI
10.1055/a-1834-7101
Published
2022 Jul
Container
Endoscopy international open
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1055/a-1834-7101,
  title = {Impact of guidewire caliber on ERCP outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing 0.025- and 0.035-inch guidewires.},
  author = {Aziz M and Iqbal A and Ahmed Z and Saleem S and Lee-Smith W and Goyal H and Kamal F and Alastal Y and Nawras A and Adler DG},
  year = {2022},
  journal = {Endoscopy international open},
  doi = {10.1055/a-1834-7101},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1834-7101}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Impact of guidewire caliber on ERCP outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing 0.025- and 0.035-inch guidewires.
AU  - Aziz M
AU  - Iqbal A
AU  - Ahmed Z
AU  - Saleem S
AU  - Lee-Smith W
AU  - Goyal H
AU  - Kamal F
AU  - Alastal Y
AU  - Nawras A
AU  - Adler DG
PY  - 2022
JO  - Endoscopy international open
DO  - 10.1055/a-1834-7101
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1834-7101
ER  - 

APA

M, A., A, I., Z, A., S, S., W, L., H, G., F, K., Y, A., A, N., & DG, A. (2022). Impact of guidewire caliber on ERCP outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing 0.025- and 0.035-inch guidewires.. Endoscopy international open. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1834-7101

Source records