[The 1-cm lower calyx calculus: SWT, URS or Mini-PCNL? Guidelines vs. reality.].

Olbert PJ

Open source

DOI
10.1055/a-2290-7250
Published
2024 Jun
Container
Aktuelle Urologie
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
no

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1055/a-2290-7250,
  title = {[The 1-cm lower calyx calculus: SWT, URS or Mini-PCNL? Guidelines vs. reality.].},
  author = {Olbert PJ},
  year = {2024},
  journal = {Aktuelle Urologie},
  doi = {10.1055/a-2290-7250},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2290-7250}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - [The 1-cm lower calyx calculus: SWT, URS or Mini-PCNL? Guidelines vs. reality.].
AU  - Olbert PJ
PY  - 2024
JO  - Aktuelle Urologie
DO  - 10.1055/a-2290-7250
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2290-7250
ER  - 

APA

PJ, O. (2024). [The 1-cm lower calyx calculus: SWT, URS or Mini-PCNL? Guidelines vs. reality.].. Aktuelle Urologie. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2290-7250

Source records