[Comparison of Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Diagnosing a Penile Fracture: A Retrospective Data Analysis].

Morische SK, Fürschke A, Gilbert N, Osmonov D, Merseburger AS, Brozat-Essen S

Open source

DOI
10.1055/a-2606-4501
Published
2026 Feb
Container
Aktuelle Urologie
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1055/a-2606-4501,
  title = {[Comparison of Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Diagnosing a Penile Fracture: A Retrospective Data Analysis].},
  author = {Morische SK and Fürschke A and Gilbert N and Osmonov D and Merseburger AS and Brozat-Essen S},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Aktuelle Urologie},
  doi = {10.1055/a-2606-4501},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2606-4501}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - [Comparison of Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Diagnosing a Penile Fracture: A Retrospective Data Analysis].
AU  - Morische SK
AU  - Fürschke A
AU  - Gilbert N
AU  - Osmonov D
AU  - Merseburger AS
AU  - Brozat-Essen S
PY  - 2026
JO  - Aktuelle Urologie
DO  - 10.1055/a-2606-4501
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2606-4501
ER  - 

APA

SK, M., A, F., N, G., D, O., AS, M., & S, B. (2026). [Comparison of Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Diagnosing a Penile Fracture: A Retrospective Data Analysis].. Aktuelle Urologie. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2606-4501

Source records