Is size, morphology, site, and access scoring system consistent between endoscopists? Interobserver and intraobserver polyp assessment study.
- DOI
- 10.1055/a-2752-2591
- Published
- 2025
- Container
- Endoscopy international open
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1055/a-2752-2591,
title = {Is size, morphology, site, and access scoring system consistent between endoscopists? Interobserver and intraobserver polyp assessment study.},
author = {Thoufeeq M and Thaika A and Moudhgalya S and Mundre P and Abeysuriya V and Nishad N},
year = {2025},
journal = {Endoscopy international open},
doi = {10.1055/a-2752-2591},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2752-2591}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Is size, morphology, site, and access scoring system consistent between endoscopists? Interobserver and intraobserver polyp assessment study. AU - Thoufeeq M AU - Thaika A AU - Moudhgalya S AU - Mundre P AU - Abeysuriya V AU - Nishad N PY - 2025 JO - Endoscopy international open DO - 10.1055/a-2752-2591 UR - https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2752-2591 ER -
APA
M, T., A, T., S, M., P, M., V, A., & N, N. (2025). Is size, morphology, site, and access scoring system consistent between endoscopists? Interobserver and intraobserver polyp assessment study.. Endoscopy international open. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2752-2591
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T02:16:08.092Z