In Reply to: "Comment on: Dose-Optimized Image Acquisition Parameters for Neonatal Chest Radiography: A Phantom Study Comparing Computed Radiography and Wireless Digital Radiography Needle Detectors".
- DOI
- 10.1055/a-2821-1653
- Published
- 2026 Jun
- Container
- RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1055/a-2821-1653,
title = {In Reply to: "Comment on: Dose-Optimized Image Acquisition Parameters for Neonatal Chest Radiography: A Phantom Study Comparing Computed Radiography and Wireless Digital Radiography Needle Detectors".},
author = {Rama K and Esser M and Spogis J and Wanninger F and Hoberg B and Schäfer JF},
year = {2026},
journal = {RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin},
doi = {10.1055/a-2821-1653},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2821-1653}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - In Reply to: "Comment on: Dose-Optimized Image Acquisition Parameters for Neonatal Chest Radiography: A Phantom Study Comparing Computed Radiography and Wireless Digital Radiography Needle Detectors". AU - Rama K AU - Esser M AU - Spogis J AU - Wanninger F AU - Hoberg B AU - Schäfer JF PY - 2026 JO - RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin DO - 10.1055/a-2821-1653 UR - https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2821-1653 ER -
APA
K, R., M, E., J, S., F, W., B, H., & JF, S. (2026). In Reply to: "Comment on: Dose-Optimized Image Acquisition Parameters for Neonatal Chest Radiography: A Phantom Study Comparing Computed Radiography and Wireless Digital Radiography Needle Detectors".. RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2821-1653
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-11-10T09:23:54.262Z