EUS-HGS with antegrade stenting vs. hepaticogastrostomy alone for malignant biliary drainage: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
- DOI
- 10.1055/a-2840-6762
- Published
- 2026
- Container
- Endoscopy international open
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1055/a-2840-6762,
title = {EUS-HGS with antegrade stenting vs. hepaticogastrostomy alone for malignant biliary drainage: Systematic review and meta-analysis.},
author = {Khoury T and Sbeit W and Fumex F and Fusaroli P and Masciangelo G and Bruni A and Barbara G and Anderloni A and Kitano M and Itonaga M and Ogura T and Praticò CA and Gincul R and Leblanc S and Teoh AYB and Jacques J and Napoleon B and Lisotti A},
year = {2026},
journal = {Endoscopy international open},
doi = {10.1055/a-2840-6762},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2840-6762}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - EUS-HGS with antegrade stenting vs. hepaticogastrostomy alone for malignant biliary drainage: Systematic review and meta-analysis. AU - Khoury T AU - Sbeit W AU - Fumex F AU - Fusaroli P AU - Masciangelo G AU - Bruni A AU - Barbara G AU - Anderloni A AU - Kitano M AU - Itonaga M AU - Ogura T AU - Praticò CA AU - Gincul R AU - Leblanc S AU - Teoh AYB AU - Jacques J AU - Napoleon B AU - Lisotti A PY - 2026 JO - Endoscopy international open DO - 10.1055/a-2840-6762 UR - https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2840-6762 ER -
APA
T, K., W, S., F, F., P, F., G, M., A, B., G, B., A, A., M, K., M, I., T, O., CA, P., R, G., S, L., AYB, T., J, J., B, N., & A, L. (2026). EUS-HGS with antegrade stenting vs. hepaticogastrostomy alone for malignant biliary drainage: Systematic review and meta-analysis.. Endoscopy international open. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2840-6762
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T17:49:17.000Z
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-26T17:49:17.016Z
- doaj · retrieved 2026-09-26T17:49:17.024Z