[Devil's Advocate: Exclusive breastfeeding for six months - evidence-based gold standard or well-intentioned myth?].

Kopp MV, Hamelmann E

DOI: 10.1055/a-2854-2379
Published: 2026 Sep
Container: Klinische Padiatrie
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1055/a-2854-2379,
  title = {[Devil's Advocate: Exclusive breastfeeding for six months - evidence-based gold standard or well-intentioned myth?].},
  author = {Kopp MV and Hamelmann E},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Klinische Padiatrie},
  doi = {10.1055/a-2854-2379},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2854-2379}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - [Devil's Advocate: Exclusive breastfeeding for six months - evidence-based gold standard or well-intentioned myth?].
AU  - Kopp MV
AU  - Hamelmann E
PY  - 2026
JO  - Klinische Padiatrie
DO  - 10.1055/a-2854-2379
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2854-2379
ER  -

APA

MV, K., & E, H. (2026). [Devil's Advocate: Exclusive breastfeeding for six months - evidence-based gold standard or well-intentioned myth?].. Klinische Padiatrie. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2854-2379

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T02:09:43.048Z