Progression or Regression? - Strengths and Weaknesses of the New Munich Nomenclature III for Cervix Cytology.

Hilal Z, Tempfer C, Schiermeier S, Reinecke J, Ruppenkamp C, Hilal Z

Open source

DOI
10.1055/s-0035-1557904
Published
2015 Oct
Container
Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1055/s-0035-1557904,
  title = {Progression or Regression? - Strengths and Weaknesses of the New Munich Nomenclature III for Cervix Cytology.},
  author = {Hilal Z and Tempfer C and Schiermeier S and Reinecke J and Ruppenkamp C and Hilal Z},
  year = {2015},
  journal = {Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde},
  doi = {10.1055/s-0035-1557904},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1557904}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Progression or Regression? - Strengths and Weaknesses of the New Munich Nomenclature III for Cervix Cytology.
AU  - Hilal Z
AU  - Tempfer C
AU  - Schiermeier S
AU  - Reinecke J
AU  - Ruppenkamp C
AU  - Hilal Z
PY  - 2015
JO  - Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde
DO  - 10.1055/s-0035-1557904
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1557904
ER  - 

APA

Z, H., C, T., S, S., J, R., C, R., & Z, H. (2015). Progression or Regression? - Strengths and Weaknesses of the New Munich Nomenclature III for Cervix Cytology.. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1557904

Source records