Progression or Regression? - Strengths and Weaknesses of the New Munich Nomenclature III for Cervix Cytology.
- DOI
- 10.1055/s-0035-1557904
- Published
- 2015 Oct
- Container
- Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1055/s-0035-1557904,
title = {Progression or Regression? - Strengths and Weaknesses of the New Munich Nomenclature III for Cervix Cytology.},
author = {Hilal Z and Tempfer C and Schiermeier S and Reinecke J and Ruppenkamp C and Hilal Z},
year = {2015},
journal = {Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde},
doi = {10.1055/s-0035-1557904},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1557904}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Progression or Regression? - Strengths and Weaknesses of the New Munich Nomenclature III for Cervix Cytology. AU - Hilal Z AU - Tempfer C AU - Schiermeier S AU - Reinecke J AU - Ruppenkamp C AU - Hilal Z PY - 2015 JO - Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde DO - 10.1055/s-0035-1557904 UR - https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1557904 ER -
APA
Z, H., C, T., S, S., J, R., C, R., & Z, H. (2015). Progression or Regression? - Strengths and Weaknesses of the New Munich Nomenclature III for Cervix Cytology.. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1557904
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-27T14:34:10.416Z