[ProSeal-laryngeal mask versus endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing gynaecologic laparoscopy].

Piper SN, Triem JG, Röhm KD, Maleck WH, Schöllhorn TA, Boldt J

Open source

DOI
10.1055/s-2004-814331
Published
2004 Mar
Container
Anasthesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin, Schmerztherapie : AINS
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

serious concern Score 8/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1055/s-2004-814331,
  title = {[ProSeal-laryngeal mask versus endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing gynaecologic laparoscopy].},
  author = {Piper SN and Triem JG and Röhm KD and Maleck WH and Schöllhorn TA and Boldt J},
  year = {2004},
  journal = {Anasthesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin, Schmerztherapie : AINS},
  doi = {10.1055/s-2004-814331},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-814331}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - [ProSeal-laryngeal mask versus endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing gynaecologic laparoscopy].
AU  - Piper SN
AU  - Triem JG
AU  - Röhm KD
AU  - Maleck WH
AU  - Schöllhorn TA
AU  - Boldt J
PY  - 2004
JO  - Anasthesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin, Schmerztherapie : AINS
DO  - 10.1055/s-2004-814331
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-814331
ER  - 

APA

SN, P., JG, T., KD, R., WH, M., TA, S., & J, B. (2004). [ProSeal-laryngeal mask versus endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing gynaecologic laparoscopy].. Anasthesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin, Schmerztherapie : AINS. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-814331

Source records