Are ‘red wall’ constituencies really opposed to progressive policy? Examining the impact of materialist narratives for Universal Basic Income

Matthew Johnson, Elliott Johnson, Daniel Nettle

Open source

DOI
10.1057/s41293-022-00220-z
Published
2022-10-18
Container
British Politics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1057/s41293-022-00220-z,
  title = {Are ‘red wall’ constituencies really opposed to progressive policy? Examining the impact of materialist narratives for Universal Basic Income},
  author = {Matthew Johnson and Elliott Johnson and Daniel Nettle},
  year = {2022},
  journal = {British Politics},
  doi = {10.1057/s41293-022-00220-z},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-022-00220-z}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Are ‘red wall’ constituencies really opposed to progressive policy? Examining the impact of materialist narratives for Universal Basic Income
AU  - Matthew Johnson
AU  - Elliott Johnson
AU  - Daniel Nettle
PY  - 2022
JO  - British Politics
DO  - 10.1057/s41293-022-00220-z
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-022-00220-z
ER  - 

APA

Johnson, M., Johnson, E., & Nettle, D. (2022). Are ‘red wall’ constituencies really opposed to progressive policy? Examining the impact of materialist narratives for Universal Basic Income. British Politics. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-022-00220-z

Source records