Empirical Comparison of Two Methods for the Bayesian Update of the Parameters of Probability Distributions in a Two-Level Hybrid Probabilistic-Possibilistic Uncertainty Framework for Risk Assessment
- DOI
- 10.1061/ajrua6.0000848
- Published
- 2016-03
- Container
- ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
- Publisher
- American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1061/ajrua6.0000848,
title = {Empirical Comparison of Two Methods for the Bayesian Update of the Parameters of Probability Distributions in a Two-Level Hybrid Probabilistic-Possibilistic Uncertainty Framework for Risk Assessment},
author = {N. Pedroni and E. Zio and A. Pasanisi and M. Couplet},
year = {2016},
journal = {ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering},
doi = {10.1061/ajrua6.0000848},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1061/ajrua6.0000848}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Empirical Comparison of Two Methods for the Bayesian Update of the Parameters of Probability Distributions in a Two-Level Hybrid Probabilistic-Possibilistic Uncertainty Framework for Risk Assessment AU - N. Pedroni AU - E. Zio AU - A. Pasanisi AU - M. Couplet PY - 2016 JO - ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering DO - 10.1061/ajrua6.0000848 UR - https://doi.org/10.1061/ajrua6.0000848 ER -
APA
Pedroni, N., Zio, E., Pasanisi, A., & Couplet, M. (2016). Empirical Comparison of Two Methods for the Bayesian Update of the Parameters of Probability Distributions in a Two-Level Hybrid Probabilistic-Possibilistic Uncertainty Framework for Risk Assessment. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1061/ajrua6.0000848
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-11-04T21:01:50.482Z