Safety of a two-day ultrarush insect venom immunotherapy protocol in comparison with protocols of longer duration and involving a larger number of injections.
- DOI
- 10.1067/mai.2000.105708
- Published
- 2000 Jun
- Container
- The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1067/mai.2000.105708,
title = {Safety of a two-day ultrarush insect venom immunotherapy protocol in comparison with protocols of longer duration and involving a larger number of injections.},
author = {Brehler R and Wolf H and Kütting B and Schnitker J and Luger T},
year = {2000},
journal = {The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology},
doi = {10.1067/mai.2000.105708},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1067/mai.2000.105708}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Safety of a two-day ultrarush insect venom immunotherapy protocol in comparison with protocols of longer duration and involving a larger number of injections. AU - Brehler R AU - Wolf H AU - Kütting B AU - Schnitker J AU - Luger T PY - 2000 JO - The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology DO - 10.1067/mai.2000.105708 UR - https://doi.org/10.1067/mai.2000.105708 ER -
APA
R, B., H, W., B, K., J, S., & T, L. (2000). Safety of a two-day ultrarush insect venom immunotherapy protocol in comparison with protocols of longer duration and involving a larger number of injections.. The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology. https://doi.org/10.1067/mai.2000.105708
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T07:19:58.516Z