Assessment of coronary flow reserve with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography: comparison among adenosine, standard-dose dipyridamole, and high-dose dipyridamole.
- DOI
- 10.1067/mje.2000.103508
- Published
- 2000 Apr
- Container
- Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1067/mje.2000.103508,
title = {Assessment of coronary flow reserve with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography: comparison among adenosine, standard-dose dipyridamole, and high-dose dipyridamole.},
author = {Lim HE and Shim WJ and Rhee H and Kim SM and Hwang GS and Kim YH and Seo HS and Oh DJ and Ro YM},
year = {2000},
journal = {Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography},
doi = {10.1067/mje.2000.103508},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1067/mje.2000.103508}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Assessment of coronary flow reserve with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography: comparison among adenosine, standard-dose dipyridamole, and high-dose dipyridamole. AU - Lim HE AU - Shim WJ AU - Rhee H AU - Kim SM AU - Hwang GS AU - Kim YH AU - Seo HS AU - Oh DJ AU - Ro YM PY - 2000 JO - Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography DO - 10.1067/mje.2000.103508 UR - https://doi.org/10.1067/mje.2000.103508 ER -
APA
HE, L., WJ, S., H, R., SM, K., GS, H., YH, K., HS, S., DJ, O., & YM, R. (2000). Assessment of coronary flow reserve with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography: comparison among adenosine, standard-dose dipyridamole, and high-dose dipyridamole.. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography. https://doi.org/10.1067/mje.2000.103508
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T03:53:48.436Z