A randomized trial of cerclage versus no cerclage among patients with ultrasonographically detected second-trimester preterm dilatation of the internal os.
- DOI
- 10.1067/mob.2000.109040
- Published
- 2000 Oct
- Container
- American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1067/mob.2000.109040,
title = {A randomized trial of cerclage versus no cerclage among patients with ultrasonographically detected second-trimester preterm dilatation of the internal os.},
author = {Rust OA and Atlas RO and Jones KJ and Benham BN and Balducci J},
year = {2000},
journal = {American journal of obstetrics and gynecology},
doi = {10.1067/mob.2000.109040},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2000.109040}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - A randomized trial of cerclage versus no cerclage among patients with ultrasonographically detected second-trimester preterm dilatation of the internal os. AU - Rust OA AU - Atlas RO AU - Jones KJ AU - Benham BN AU - Balducci J PY - 2000 JO - American journal of obstetrics and gynecology DO - 10.1067/mob.2000.109040 UR - https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2000.109040 ER -
APA
OA, R., RO, A., KJ, J., BN, B., & J, B. (2000). A randomized trial of cerclage versus no cerclage among patients with ultrasonographically detected second-trimester preterm dilatation of the internal os.. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2000.109040
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-24T18:35:13.778Z