A randomized prospective comparative study of general versus epidural anesthesia for transcervical hysteroscopic endometrial resection

Motti Goldenberg, Shlomo B. Cohen, Aba Etchin, Shlomo Mashiach, Daniel S. Seidman

Open source

DOI
10.1067/mob.2001.108997
Published
2001-02
Container
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1067/mob.2001.108997,
  title = {A randomized prospective comparative study of general versus epidural anesthesia for transcervical hysteroscopic endometrial resection},
  author = {Motti Goldenberg and Shlomo B. Cohen and Aba Etchin and Shlomo Mashiach and Daniel S. Seidman},
  year = {2001},
  journal = {American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology},
  doi = {10.1067/mob.2001.108997},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2001.108997}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - A randomized prospective comparative study of general versus epidural anesthesia for transcervical hysteroscopic endometrial resection
AU  - Motti Goldenberg
AU  - Shlomo B. Cohen
AU  - Aba Etchin
AU  - Shlomo Mashiach
AU  - Daniel S. Seidman
PY  - 2001
JO  - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
DO  - 10.1067/mob.2001.108997
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2001.108997
ER  - 

APA

Goldenberg, M., Cohen, S. B., Etchin, A., Mashiach, S., & Seidman, D. S. (2001). A randomized prospective comparative study of general versus epidural anesthesia for transcervical hysteroscopic endometrial resection. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2001.108997

Source records