Do we measure the right end points? A systematic review of primary outcomes in recent neonatal randomized clinical trials.

Zhang B, Schmidt B

DOI: 10.1067/mpd.2001.110299
Published: 2001 Jan
Container: The Journal of pediatrics
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1067/mpd.2001.110299,
  title = {Do we measure the right end points? A systematic review of primary outcomes in recent neonatal randomized clinical trials.},
  author = {Zhang B and Schmidt B},
  year = {2001},
  journal = {The Journal of pediatrics},
  doi = {10.1067/mpd.2001.110299},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1067/mpd.2001.110299}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Do we measure the right end points? A systematic review of primary outcomes in recent neonatal randomized clinical trials.
AU  - Zhang B
AU  - Schmidt B
PY  - 2001
JO  - The Journal of pediatrics
DO  - 10.1067/mpd.2001.110299
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1067/mpd.2001.110299
ER  -

APA

B, Z., & B, S. (2001). Do we measure the right end points? A systematic review of primary outcomes in recent neonatal randomized clinical trials.. The Journal of pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpd.2001.110299

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-24T19:47:39.718Z