Three Perspectives Regarding What Works and Does Not Work in Therapy: A Comparison of Judgments of Clients, Nurse-Therapists, and Uninvolved Evaluators

Bonnie Jean Raingruber

Open source

DOI
10.1067/mpn.2001.114540
Published
2001-02
Container
Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1067/mpn.2001.114540,
  title = {Three Perspectives Regarding What Works and Does Not Work in Therapy: A Comparison of Judgments of Clients, Nurse-Therapists, and Uninvolved Evaluators},
  author = {Bonnie Jean Raingruber},
  year = {2001},
  journal = {Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association},
  doi = {10.1067/mpn.2001.114540},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1067/mpn.2001.114540}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Three Perspectives Regarding What Works and Does Not Work in Therapy: A Comparison of Judgments of Clients, Nurse-Therapists, and Uninvolved Evaluators
AU  - Bonnie Jean Raingruber
PY  - 2001
JO  - Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association
DO  - 10.1067/mpn.2001.114540
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1067/mpn.2001.114540
ER  - 

APA

Raingruber, B. J. (2001). Three Perspectives Regarding What Works and Does Not Work in Therapy: A Comparison of Judgments of Clients, Nurse-Therapists, and Uninvolved Evaluators. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpn.2001.114540

Source records