Minimally invasive versus sternotomy approaches for mitral reconstruction: comparison of intermediate-term results.
- DOI
- 10.1067/mtc.2001.112626
- Published
- 2001 Apr
- Container
- The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1067/mtc.2001.112626,
title = {Minimally invasive versus sternotomy approaches for mitral reconstruction: comparison of intermediate-term results.},
author = {Grossi EA and LaPietra A and Ribakove GH and Delianides J and Esposito R and Culliford AT and Derivaux CC and Applebaum RM and Kronzon I and Steinberg BM and Baumann FG and Galloway AC and Colvin SB},
year = {2001},
journal = {The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery},
doi = {10.1067/mtc.2001.112626},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1067/mtc.2001.112626}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Minimally invasive versus sternotomy approaches for mitral reconstruction: comparison of intermediate-term results. AU - Grossi EA AU - LaPietra A AU - Ribakove GH AU - Delianides J AU - Esposito R AU - Culliford AT AU - Derivaux CC AU - Applebaum RM AU - Kronzon I AU - Steinberg BM AU - Baumann FG AU - Galloway AC AU - Colvin SB PY - 2001 JO - The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery DO - 10.1067/mtc.2001.112626 UR - https://doi.org/10.1067/mtc.2001.112626 ER -
APA
EA, G., A, L., GH, R., J, D., R, E., AT, C., CC, D., RM, A., I, K., BM, S., FG, B., AC, G., & SB, C. (2001). Minimally invasive versus sternotomy approaches for mitral reconstruction: comparison of intermediate-term results.. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. https://doi.org/10.1067/mtc.2001.112626
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-24T19:48:52.096Z