Cefamandole versus cefazolin in vascular surgical wound infection prophylaxis: cost-effectiveness and risk factors.
- DOI
- 10.1067/mva.1993.48123
- Published
- 1993 Sep
- Container
- Journal of vascular surgery
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1067/mva.1993.48123,
title = {Cefamandole versus cefazolin in vascular surgical wound infection prophylaxis: cost-effectiveness and risk factors.},
author = {Edwards WH Jr and Kaiser AB and Tapper S and Edwards WH Sr and Martin RS 3rd and Mulherin JL Jr and Jenkins JM and Roach AC},
year = {1993},
journal = {Journal of vascular surgery},
doi = {10.1067/mva.1993.48123},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1067/mva.1993.48123}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Cefamandole versus cefazolin in vascular surgical wound infection prophylaxis: cost-effectiveness and risk factors. AU - Edwards WH Jr AU - Kaiser AB AU - Tapper S AU - Edwards WH Sr AU - Martin RS 3rd AU - Mulherin JL Jr AU - Jenkins JM AU - Roach AC PY - 1993 JO - Journal of vascular surgery DO - 10.1067/mva.1993.48123 UR - https://doi.org/10.1067/mva.1993.48123 ER -
APA
Jr, E. W., AB, K., S, T., Sr, E. W., 3rd, M. R., Jr, M. J., JM, J., & AC, R. (1993). Cefamandole versus cefazolin in vascular surgical wound infection prophylaxis: cost-effectiveness and risk factors.. Journal of vascular surgery. https://doi.org/10.1067/mva.1993.48123
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T06:30:45.807Z