Should the carbon footprint of imaging be considered to ensure an effective, sustainable supplementary breast screening strategy for women with dense breasts?
- DOI
- 10.1071/pu26031
- Published
- 11
- Container
- Public Health Research & Practice
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1071/pu26031,
title = {Should the carbon footprint of imaging be considered to ensure an effective, sustainable supplementary breast screening strategy for women with dense breasts?},
author = {Jennifer Isautier and Nehmat Houssami and Alexandra Barratt and Kirsten McCaffery and Alison Pearce and Brooke Nickel},
year = {2026},
journal = {Public Health Research \& Practice},
doi = {10.1071/pu26031},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1071/pu26031}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Should the carbon footprint of imaging be considered to ensure an effective, sustainable supplementary breast screening strategy for women with dense breasts? AU - Jennifer Isautier AU - Nehmat Houssami AU - Alexandra Barratt AU - Kirsten McCaffery AU - Alison Pearce AU - Brooke Nickel PY - 2026 JO - Public Health Research & Practice DO - 10.1071/pu26031 UR - https://doi.org/10.1071/pu26031 ER -
APA
Isautier, J., Houssami, N., Barratt, A., McCaffery, K., Pearce, A., & Nickel, B. (2026). Should the carbon footprint of imaging be considered to ensure an effective, sustainable supplementary breast screening strategy for women with dense breasts?. Public Health Research & Practice. https://doi.org/10.1071/pu26031
Source records
- doaj · retrieved 2026-11-10T06:37:26.755Z