Priority areas for conservation alone are not a good proxy for predicting the impact of renewable energy expansion.
- DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2204505119
- Published
- 2022 Aug 16
- Container
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1073/pnas.2204505119,
title = {Priority areas for conservation alone are not a good proxy for predicting the impact of renewable energy expansion.},
author = {Pérez-García JM and Morant J and Arrondo E and Sebastián-González E and Lambertucci SA and Santangeli A and Margalida A and Sánchez-Zapata JA and Blanco G and Donázar JA and Carrete M and Serrano D},
year = {2022},
journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America},
doi = {10.1073/pnas.2204505119},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2204505119}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Priority areas for conservation alone are not a good proxy for predicting the impact of renewable energy expansion. AU - Pérez-García JM AU - Morant J AU - Arrondo E AU - Sebastián-González E AU - Lambertucci SA AU - Santangeli A AU - Margalida A AU - Sánchez-Zapata JA AU - Blanco G AU - Donázar JA AU - Carrete M AU - Serrano D PY - 2022 JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America DO - 10.1073/pnas.2204505119 UR - https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2204505119 ER -
APA
JM, P., J, M., E, A., E, S., SA, L., A, S., A, M., JA, S., G, B., JA, D., M, C., & D, S. (2022). Priority areas for conservation alone are not a good proxy for predicting the impact of renewable energy expansion.. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2204505119
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T20:47:53.873Z