Are self-reported fertility preferences biased? Evidence from indirect elicitation methods
- DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2407629121
- Published
- 2024-08-13
- Container
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1073/pnas.2407629121,
title = {Are self-reported fertility preferences biased? Evidence from indirect elicitation methods},
author = {Christine Valente and Wen Qiang Toh and Inuwa Jalingo and Aurélia Lépine and Áureo de Paula and Grant Miller},
year = {2024},
journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences},
doi = {10.1073/pnas.2407629121},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2407629121}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Are self-reported fertility preferences biased? Evidence from indirect elicitation methods AU - Christine Valente AU - Wen Qiang Toh AU - Inuwa Jalingo AU - Aurélia Lépine AU - Áureo de Paula AU - Grant Miller PY - 2024 JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences DO - 10.1073/pnas.2407629121 UR - https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2407629121 ER -
APA
Valente, C., Toh, W. Q., Jalingo, I., Lépine, A., Paula, Á. D., & Miller, G. (2024). Are self-reported fertility preferences biased? Evidence from indirect elicitation methods. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2407629121
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T04:58:59.386Z