Most totally real fields do not have universal forms or the Northcott property.

Daans N, Kala V, Man SH, Widmer M, Yatsyna P

Open source

DOI
10.1073/pnas.2419414122
Published
2025 May 20
Container
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1073/pnas.2419414122,
  title = {Most totally real fields do not have universal forms or the Northcott property.},
  author = {Daans N and Kala V and Man SH and Widmer M and Yatsyna P},
  year = {2025},
  journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America},
  doi = {10.1073/pnas.2419414122},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2419414122}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Most totally real fields do not have universal forms or the Northcott property.
AU  - Daans N
AU  - Kala V
AU  - Man SH
AU  - Widmer M
AU  - Yatsyna P
PY  - 2025
JO  - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
DO  - 10.1073/pnas.2419414122
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2419414122
ER  - 

APA

N, D., V, K., SH, M., M, W., & P, Y. (2025). Most totally real fields do not have universal forms or the Northcott property.. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2419414122

Source records