Evidence from formal logical reasoning reveals that the language of thought is not natural language
- DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2520095123
- Published
- 2026-07-06
- Container
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1073/pnas.2520095123,
title = {Evidence from formal logical reasoning reveals that the language of thought is not natural language},
author = {Hope Kean and Alexander Fung and Paris Jaggers and Jason Chen and Joshua S. Rule and Yael Benn and Joshua B. Tenenbaum and Steven T. Piantadosi and Rosemary A. Varley and Evelina Fedorenko},
year = {2026},
journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences},
doi = {10.1073/pnas.2520095123},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2520095123}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Evidence from formal logical reasoning reveals that the language of thought is not natural language AU - Hope Kean AU - Alexander Fung AU - Paris Jaggers AU - Jason Chen AU - Joshua S. Rule AU - Yael Benn AU - Joshua B. Tenenbaum AU - Steven T. Piantadosi AU - Rosemary A. Varley AU - Evelina Fedorenko PY - 2026 JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences DO - 10.1073/pnas.2520095123 UR - https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2520095123 ER -
APA
Kean, H., Fung, A., Jaggers, P., Chen, J., Rule, J. S., Benn, Y., Tenenbaum, J. B., Piantadosi, S. T., Varley, R. A., & Fedorenko, E. (2026). Evidence from formal logical reasoning reveals that the language of thought is not natural language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2520095123
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T23:23:06.532Z