Hallucination, monofacts, and miscalibration: An empirical investigation
- DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2533582123
- Published
- 2026-02-19
- Container
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1073/pnas.2533582123,
title = {Hallucination, monofacts, and miscalibration: An empirical investigation},
author = {Miranda Muqing Miao and Michael Kearns},
year = {2026},
journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences},
doi = {10.1073/pnas.2533582123},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2533582123}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Hallucination, monofacts, and miscalibration: An empirical investigation AU - Miranda Muqing Miao AU - Michael Kearns PY - 2026 JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences DO - 10.1073/pnas.2533582123 UR - https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2533582123 ER -
APA
Miao, M. M., & Kearns, M. (2026). Hallucination, monofacts, and miscalibration: An empirical investigation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2533582123
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T11:49:09.643Z