Comparison of two atmospheric correction methods for the classification of spaceborne urban hyperspectral data depending on the spatial resolution
- DOI
- 10.1080/01431161.2017.1410247
- Published
- 2017-12-04
- Container
- International Journal of Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1080/01431161.2017.1410247,
title = {Comparison of two atmospheric correction methods for the classification of spaceborne urban hyperspectral data depending on the spatial resolution},
author = {Guillaume Roussel and Christiane Weber and Xavier Briottet and Xavier Ceamanos},
year = {2017},
journal = {International Journal of Remote Sensing},
doi = {10.1080/01431161.2017.1410247},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2017.1410247}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparison of two atmospheric correction methods for the classification of spaceborne urban hyperspectral data depending on the spatial resolution AU - Guillaume Roussel AU - Christiane Weber AU - Xavier Briottet AU - Xavier Ceamanos PY - 2017 JO - International Journal of Remote Sensing DO - 10.1080/01431161.2017.1410247 UR - https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2017.1410247 ER -
APA
Roussel, G., Weber, C., Briottet, X., & Ceamanos, X. (2017). Comparison of two atmospheric correction methods for the classification of spaceborne urban hyperspectral data depending on the spatial resolution. International Journal of Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2017.1410247
Source records
- hal · retrieved 2026-09-27T01:33:42.249Z