Author response: Clinical indicators and usage of algorithms in determining need for ophthalmological consultation in the setting of orbital fractures.
- DOI
- 10.1080/01676830.2026.2750865
- Published
- 2026 Nov 9
- Container
- Orbit (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1080/01676830.2026.2750865,
title = {Author response: Clinical indicators and usage of algorithms in determining need for ophthalmological consultation in the setting of orbital fractures.},
author = {Das U and Rickert RW and Hassan BA and Chen V and Brown T and Miglani T and Simon C and Lai E and Merbs SL and Grant MP and Munir WM and Swamy R},
year = {2026},
journal = {Orbit (Amsterdam, Netherlands)},
doi = {10.1080/01676830.2026.2750865},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/01676830.2026.2750865}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Author response: Clinical indicators and usage of algorithms in determining need for ophthalmological consultation in the setting of orbital fractures. AU - Das U AU - Rickert RW AU - Hassan BA AU - Chen V AU - Brown T AU - Miglani T AU - Simon C AU - Lai E AU - Merbs SL AU - Grant MP AU - Munir WM AU - Swamy R PY - 2026 JO - Orbit (Amsterdam, Netherlands) DO - 10.1080/01676830.2026.2750865 UR - https://doi.org/10.1080/01676830.2026.2750865 ER -
APA
U, D., RW, R., BA, H., V, C., T, B., T, M., C, S., E, L., SL, M., MP, G., WM, M., & R, S. (2026). Author response: Clinical indicators and usage of algorithms in determining need for ophthalmological consultation in the setting of orbital fractures.. Orbit (Amsterdam, Netherlands). https://doi.org/10.1080/01676830.2026.2750865
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-11-10T11:07:33.316Z