Reporting quality in systematic reviews of in vitro studies: a systematic review.
- DOI
- 10.1080/03007995.2019.1607270
- Published
- 2019 Sep
- Container
- Current medical research and opinion
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1080/03007995.2019.1607270,
title = {Reporting quality in systematic reviews of in vitro studies: a systematic review.},
author = {Elshafay A and Omran ES and Abdelkhalek M and El-Badry MO and Eisa HG and Fala SY and Dang T and Ghanem MAT and Elbadawy M and Elhady MT and Vuong NL and Hirayama K and Huy NT},
year = {2019},
journal = {Current medical research and opinion},
doi = {10.1080/03007995.2019.1607270},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2019.1607270}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Reporting quality in systematic reviews of in vitro studies: a systematic review. AU - Elshafay A AU - Omran ES AU - Abdelkhalek M AU - El-Badry MO AU - Eisa HG AU - Fala SY AU - Dang T AU - Ghanem MAT AU - Elbadawy M AU - Elhady MT AU - Vuong NL AU - Hirayama K AU - Huy NT PY - 2019 JO - Current medical research and opinion DO - 10.1080/03007995.2019.1607270 UR - https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2019.1607270 ER -
APA
A, E., ES, O., M, A., MO, E., HG, E., SY, F., T, D., MAT, G., M, E., MT, E., NL, V., K, H., & NT, H. (2019). Reporting quality in systematic reviews of in vitro studies: a systematic review.. Current medical research and opinion. https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2019.1607270
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T11:32:46.128Z