QT shortening: a proarrhythmic safety surrogate measure or an inappropriate indicator of it?

Amy Tanti, Benjamin Micallef, Janis Vella Szijj, Anthony Serracino-Inglott, John-Joseph Borg

Open source

DOI
10.1080/03007995.2022.2083401
Published
2022-06-14
Container
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1080/03007995.2022.2083401,
  title = {QT shortening: a proarrhythmic safety surrogate measure or an inappropriate indicator of it?},
  author = {Amy Tanti and Benjamin Micallef and Janis Vella Szijj and Anthony Serracino-Inglott and John-Joseph Borg},
  year = {2022},
  journal = {Current Medical Research and Opinion},
  doi = {10.1080/03007995.2022.2083401},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2022.2083401}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - QT shortening: a proarrhythmic safety surrogate measure or an inappropriate indicator of it?
AU  - Amy Tanti
AU  - Benjamin Micallef
AU  - Janis Vella Szijj
AU  - Anthony Serracino-Inglott
AU  - John-Joseph Borg
PY  - 2022
JO  - Current Medical Research and Opinion
DO  - 10.1080/03007995.2022.2083401
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2022.2083401
ER  - 

APA

Tanti, A., Micallef, B., Szijj, J. V., Serracino-Inglott, A., & Borg, J. (2022). QT shortening: a proarrhythmic safety surrogate measure or an inappropriate indicator of it?. Current Medical Research and Opinion. https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2022.2083401

Source records