The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the comprehensive assessment of acceptance and commitment therapy processes in individuals with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A cross-sectional study.
- DOI
- 10.1080/07347332.2026.2731453
- Published
- 2026 Sep 12
- Container
- Journal of psychosocial oncology
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1080/07347332.2026.2731453,
title = {The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the comprehensive assessment of acceptance and commitment therapy processes in individuals with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A cross-sectional study.},
author = {Chen S and Zhao W and Ma L and Liu L and Li L},
year = {2026},
journal = {Journal of psychosocial oncology},
doi = {10.1080/07347332.2026.2731453},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2026.2731453}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the comprehensive assessment of acceptance and commitment therapy processes in individuals with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A cross-sectional study. AU - Chen S AU - Zhao W AU - Ma L AU - Liu L AU - Li L PY - 2026 JO - Journal of psychosocial oncology DO - 10.1080/07347332.2026.2731453 UR - https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2026.2731453 ER -
APA
S, C., W, Z., L, M., L, L., & L, L. (2026). The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the comprehensive assessment of acceptance and commitment therapy processes in individuals with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A cross-sectional study.. Journal of psychosocial oncology. https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2026.2731453
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T16:34:20.547Z