Reliability and validity of a smartwatch with a photoplethysmograph: Comparison with a Holter electrocardiograph.

Tan C, Tamei T, Ishii A, Arimoto N, Shiotani H.

Open source

DOI
10.1080/07420528.2026.2669593
Published
2026-05-08
Container
Chronobiol Int
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
no

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1080/07420528.2026.2669593,
  title = {Reliability and validity of a smartwatch with a photoplethysmograph: Comparison with a Holter electrocardiograph.},
  author = {Tan C and  Tamei T and  Ishii A and  Arimoto N and  Shiotani H.},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Chronobiol Int},
  doi = {10.1080/07420528.2026.2669593},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/07420528.2026.2669593}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Reliability and validity of a smartwatch with a photoplethysmograph: Comparison with a Holter electrocardiograph.
AU  - Tan C
AU  -  Tamei T
AU  -  Ishii A
AU  -  Arimoto N
AU  -  Shiotani H.
PY  - 2026
JO  - Chronobiol Int
DO  - 10.1080/07420528.2026.2669593
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1080/07420528.2026.2669593
ER  - 

APA

C, T., T, T., A, I., N, A., & H., S. (2026). Reliability and validity of a smartwatch with a photoplethysmograph: Comparison with a Holter electrocardiograph.. Chronobiol Int. https://doi.org/10.1080/07420528.2026.2669593

Source records