Easy to criticize when you have not done the work: when letters to the editor become a substitute for original research

Filippo Migliorini, Nicola Maffulli

Open source

DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2026.2724569
Published: 2026-09-06
Container: Annals of Medicine
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1080/07853890.2026.2724569,
  title = {Easy to criticize when you have not done the work: when letters to the editor become a substitute for original research},
  author = {Filippo Migliorini and Nicola Maffulli},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Annals of Medicine},
  doi = {10.1080/07853890.2026.2724569},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2026.2724569}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Easy to criticize when you have not done the work: when letters to the editor become a substitute for original research
AU  - Filippo Migliorini
AU  - Nicola Maffulli
PY  - 2026
JO  - Annals of Medicine
DO  - 10.1080/07853890.2026.2724569
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2026.2724569
ER  -

APA

Migliorini, F., & Maffulli, N. (2026). Easy to criticize when you have not done the work: when letters to the editor become a substitute for original research. Annals of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2026.2724569

Source records

crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T19:32:46.715Z