Are equitable physical performance tests perceived to be fair? Understanding officer cadets' perceptions of fitness standards.
- DOI
- 10.1080/08995605.2022.2118486
- Published
- 2023 May-Jun
- Container
- Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1080/08995605.2022.2118486,
title = {Are equitable physical performance tests perceived to be fair? Understanding officer cadets' perceptions of fitness standards.},
author = {Deng ME and Ford E and Nicol AAM and De France K},
year = {2023},
journal = {Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association},
doi = {10.1080/08995605.2022.2118486},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2022.2118486}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Are equitable physical performance tests perceived to be fair? Understanding officer cadets' perceptions of fitness standards. AU - Deng ME AU - Ford E AU - Nicol AAM AU - De France K PY - 2023 JO - Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association DO - 10.1080/08995605.2022.2118486 UR - https://doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2022.2118486 ER -
APA
ME, D., E, F., AAM, N., & K, D. F. (2023). Are equitable physical performance tests perceived to be fair? Understanding officer cadets' perceptions of fitness standards.. Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2022.2118486
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T12:55:12.787Z