Methylene blue versus hydroxocobalamin for septic shock: a real-world comparative effectiveness study using TriNetX.
- DOI
- 10.1080/08998280.2026.2697704
- Published
- 2026 Aug 7
- Container
- Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- no
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1080/08998280.2026.2697704,
title = {Methylene blue versus hydroxocobalamin for septic shock: a real-world comparative effectiveness study using TriNetX.},
author = {Pei Le J and Gupta N and Singh S and Zafar P and McCraw C and Gul R and Ahmed O and Baker Sheikh A and Patel D and Nasrullah A},
year = {2026},
journal = {Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)},
doi = {10.1080/08998280.2026.2697704},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2026.2697704}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Methylene blue versus hydroxocobalamin for septic shock: a real-world comparative effectiveness study using TriNetX. AU - Pei Le J AU - Gupta N AU - Singh S AU - Zafar P AU - McCraw C AU - Gul R AU - Ahmed O AU - Baker Sheikh A AU - Patel D AU - Nasrullah A PY - 2026 JO - Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) DO - 10.1080/08998280.2026.2697704 UR - https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2026.2697704 ER -
APA
J, P. L., N, G., S, S., P, Z., C, M., R, G., O, A., A, B. S., D, P., & A, N. (2026). Methylene blue versus hydroxocobalamin for septic shock: a real-world comparative effectiveness study using TriNetX.. Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center). https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2026.2697704
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T15:15:07.038Z
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-25T15:15:07.073Z