Methylene blue versus hydroxocobalamin for septic shock: a real-world comparative effectiveness study using TriNetX.

Pei Le J, Gupta N, Singh S, Zafar P, McCraw C, Gul R, Ahmed O, Baker Sheikh A, Patel D, Nasrullah A

Open source

DOI
10.1080/08998280.2026.2697704
Published
2026 Aug 7
Container
Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
no

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1080/08998280.2026.2697704,
  title = {Methylene blue versus hydroxocobalamin for septic shock: a real-world comparative effectiveness study using TriNetX.},
  author = {Pei Le J and Gupta N and Singh S and Zafar P and McCraw C and Gul R and Ahmed O and Baker Sheikh A and Patel D and Nasrullah A},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)},
  doi = {10.1080/08998280.2026.2697704},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2026.2697704}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Methylene blue versus hydroxocobalamin for septic shock: a real-world comparative effectiveness study using TriNetX.
AU  - Pei Le J
AU  - Gupta N
AU  - Singh S
AU  - Zafar P
AU  - McCraw C
AU  - Gul R
AU  - Ahmed O
AU  - Baker Sheikh A
AU  - Patel D
AU  - Nasrullah A
PY  - 2026
JO  - Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)
DO  - 10.1080/08998280.2026.2697704
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2026.2697704
ER  - 

APA

J, P. L., N, G., S, S., P, Z., C, M., R, G., O, A., A, B. S., D, P., & A, N. (2026). Methylene blue versus hydroxocobalamin for septic shock: a real-world comparative effectiveness study using TriNetX.. Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center). https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2026.2697704

Source records