Clinical approach to balance intensity in people with multiple sclerosis: clinical judgment versus the Balance Intensity Tool for Exercise – an inter-rater agreement and reliability study
- DOI
- 10.1080/09593985.2026.2755867
- Published
- 2026-10-31
- Container
- Physiotherapy Theory and Practice
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1080/09593985.2026.2755867,
title = {Clinical approach to balance intensity in people with multiple sclerosis: clinical judgment versus the Balance Intensity Tool for Exercise – an inter-rater agreement and reliability study},
author = {Jacob Callesen and Andreas Wallin and Sverker Johansson and John Kodal Brincks},
year = {2026},
journal = {Physiotherapy Theory and Practice},
doi = {10.1080/09593985.2026.2755867},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2026.2755867}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Clinical approach to balance intensity in people with multiple sclerosis: clinical judgment versus the Balance Intensity Tool for Exercise – an inter-rater agreement and reliability study AU - Jacob Callesen AU - Andreas Wallin AU - Sverker Johansson AU - John Kodal Brincks PY - 2026 JO - Physiotherapy Theory and Practice DO - 10.1080/09593985.2026.2755867 UR - https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2026.2755867 ER -
APA
Callesen, J., Wallin, A., Johansson, S., & Brincks, J. K. (2026). Clinical approach to balance intensity in people with multiple sclerosis: clinical judgment versus the Balance Intensity Tool for Exercise – an inter-rater agreement and reliability study. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2026.2755867
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-11-10T11:32:40.257Z