Fool me twice: how effective is debriefing in false memory studies?

Murphy G, Loftus E, Grady RH, Levine LJ, Greene CM

DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2020.1803917
Published: 2020 Aug
Container: Memory (Hove, England)
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1080/09658211.2020.1803917,
  title = {Fool me twice: how effective is debriefing in false memory studies?},
  author = {Murphy G and Loftus E and Grady RH and Levine LJ and Greene CM},
  year = {2020},
  journal = {Memory (Hove, England)},
  doi = {10.1080/09658211.2020.1803917},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2020.1803917}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Fool me twice: how effective is debriefing in false memory studies?
AU  - Murphy G
AU  - Loftus E
AU  - Grady RH
AU  - Levine LJ
AU  - Greene CM
PY  - 2020
JO  - Memory (Hove, England)
DO  - 10.1080/09658211.2020.1803917
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2020.1803917
ER  -

APA

G, M., E, L., RH, G., LJ, L., & CM, G. (2020). Fool me twice: how effective is debriefing in false memory studies?. Memory (Hove, England). https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2020.1803917

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T01:48:01.449Z